- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mormons Taking Over Central Florida
Posted on 11/9/15 at 4:00 pm to bfniii
Posted on 11/9/15 at 4:00 pm to bfniii
bfniiii,
Perhaps I did not make myself clear. You need these ordinances to be saved. Christ himself said so. What the LDS church does is perform the ordinances vicariously for the dead. In the afterlife, they'll have a chance to hear true doctrine and accept it or reject it. If they accept it, they will have their baptism because someone performed the work for them when they died. If they reject the gospel, the baptism provided for them vicariously is of no effect.
As far as being rebaptized, yes we view this as essential. We believe that God restored his church here on the earth with his priesthood power. Any ordinance performed without the proper authority is not valid. Now, I know this idea may be controversial, but is it really far fetched? So many different Christian religions out there and not a one of them can agree on doctrine. Each offer their own baptism. Is it far fetched that they may lack proper authority to perform said ordinances?
Scriptures tell us that the House of God is a house of order. In my mind, it makes no sense to me that two religions teaching separate doctrines that conflict with each other could both possess the proper authority to perform these ordinances. We believe the Priesthood was restored through the Lord's church. Obviously we believe that the LDS church is God's church here on the earth, possessing all authority to perform these ordinances.
Hope that helps.
Perhaps I did not make myself clear. You need these ordinances to be saved. Christ himself said so. What the LDS church does is perform the ordinances vicariously for the dead. In the afterlife, they'll have a chance to hear true doctrine and accept it or reject it. If they accept it, they will have their baptism because someone performed the work for them when they died. If they reject the gospel, the baptism provided for them vicariously is of no effect.
As far as being rebaptized, yes we view this as essential. We believe that God restored his church here on the earth with his priesthood power. Any ordinance performed without the proper authority is not valid. Now, I know this idea may be controversial, but is it really far fetched? So many different Christian religions out there and not a one of them can agree on doctrine. Each offer their own baptism. Is it far fetched that they may lack proper authority to perform said ordinances?
Scriptures tell us that the House of God is a house of order. In my mind, it makes no sense to me that two religions teaching separate doctrines that conflict with each other could both possess the proper authority to perform these ordinances. We believe the Priesthood was restored through the Lord's church. Obviously we believe that the LDS church is God's church here on the earth, possessing all authority to perform these ordinances.
Hope that helps.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News