re: I just now finished the Serial podcast

quote:

---

You are comparing an angry football fan criticizing a coach for a play call to a logical thinking person who prefers for judgements in criminal cases to be based on the total body of evidence presented in that case rather than an edited and clearly biased presentation by a skilled story teller.

Now who is being absurd?

---

You.

And additionally so because you didn't understand an apt analogy.

I'll give you one more try with it:

Retarded sports poster thinks coach's incorrect playcalling decision can't be questioned by mere fan because coach has more information about the team than mere fan.

Retarded Serilal Podcast poster thinks jury's decision can't be questioned by mere non-juror because jurors heard EVERY SINGLE WORD and not merely a listing of the pertinent evidence.

I hope that helped.