- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No thread on Vikings?
Posted on 4/24/15 at 12:25 pm to More beer please
Posted on 4/24/15 at 12:25 pm to More beer please
quote:
quote:
This likely won't end well for the Franks.
Doesnt Rollo become a duke, marry a french chick, and rule over parts of france for a while?
It would seem so and that meshes will real history to some extent. All I'm saying is: if the Frankish King is expecting Rollo to betray his brother, Ragnar, again, he should rethink that plan. But it will be interesting to see how it plays out on the show. Mostly Ragnar wants land for his people to farm and it would seem that has been given to Rollo in the form of the future Normandy. Historically the show could easily continue to 1066 with the Conquest of England by the Norman Duke, William the Conqueror.
As an aside, I did not remember that the etymology of "Norman" basically derived from an old Franconian word meaning Nortmann or Northman: LINK
==========================================
The English name "Normans" comes from the French words Normans/Normanz, plural of Normant,[3] modern French normand, which is itself borrowed from Old Low Franconian Nortmann "Northman"[4] or directly from Old Norse Norðmaðr, Latinized as Nortmannus (recorded in Medieval Latin, 9th century) to mean "Norseman, Viking".[5]
Posted on 4/24/15 at 1:40 pm to davesdawgs
quote:
Historically the show could easily continue to 1066 with the Conquest of England by the Norman Duke, William the Conqueror.
History could really have struck gold with this show, assuming the rating are still strong. That time frame is largely untouched by modern tv shows and movies. Amazing considering how bad arse these warriors and battles were. Could start with Robert the Magnificent and finish with William the Conqueror. Much like they are starting with Ragnar and finishing with his sons.
I think going forward, they need to age Ragnar's sons and start getting more into their English invasions. Guy playing Bjorn is ok, but not a commanding actor. (His completely dead performance to walking around with slight limp a day later didn't help his case) I really didn't realize how much the show would miss Aethelstan. They need to progress the story a little faster IMO. I was thrown the last time they did it, but it led to a great season. Oh and less time with boring Catholic royalty and more time with psycho pagan Vikings.
This post was edited on 4/24/15 at 1:47 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News