- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mineral Rights vs. Royaly Interest Question
Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:44 am to TSLG
Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:44 am to TSLG
quote:
What state? I don't think it's 4-0 anymore. Without seeing the specific language, I'm going with person B also.
It is definitely B. The argument that an instrument that specifically includes minerals and is silent on royalty somehow constitutes a reservation of royalty rights is completely absurd. B needs to get a lawyer right now.
It's like selling a lot with a house and a pool then saying the new owner can't swim there because the deed didn't specifically include the pool water.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News