- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is why Super Bowl rings are mostly irrelevant
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:31 pm to League Champs
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:31 pm to League Champs
So if Jordan didn't win a single championship is he still the greatest?
1
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:38 pm to ZeeDustin
quote:
So if Jordan didn't win a single championship is he still the greatest?
Because a shooting guard on a 5 man basketball team is totally the same as a QB on a football team with 22 starters and 11 special teamers.
Some of you are totally missing this guys point.
Brady was one of the greatest quarterbacks of all time when he put the Pats up by 4. Butler getting that int didn't magically make him greater, and he wouldn't have magically been worse if Wilson throws the winning TD pass there.
That's all the guy is saying. Using rings as a metric of QB greatness is a little silly. That's all.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News