Started By
Message

re: Interstate Cable Barriers

Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:23 am to
Posted by Road Tiger
SW Landmass
Member since Oct 2014
834 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Are very expensive to maintain and suffer extensive damage from the most minor swerving incidents on the near side. Incidents that would have resulted in no accident or damage to the vehicle/roadway are now major incidents.


The whole point of cable vs. concrete barriers is the difference in you walking away from an accident. Cables are meant to deflect and bend. That's to slow your car down at a slower rate. Concrete has no give and if you hit a concrete barrier at interstate speeds your odds of surviving decrease dramatically.

You clearly have no idea of what you're talking about.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32145 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Concrete has no give and if you hit a concrete barrier at interstate speeds your odds of surviving decrease dramatically


Concrete barriers are not unsafe. You do realize that most points of contact with any median highway barrier running parallel to travel lanes are going to be a glancing blow and not a head on collision, right?

There is more give in the cables, but the main reason they are popular now because there aren't many other options for medians with a drainage swale, which is what most rural American interstate highways have.

I think they need to redesign them to be useful further from the highway. They are just too close, subjecting them to minor impacts. It's a good idea that needs to evolve.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 8:34 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram