- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why wasn't it first and goal in OT?
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:13 am to Pauldean
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:13 am to Pauldean
quote:
Cuz what you said does not make sense.
It makes absolute perfect sense because I am 100% correct.
quote:
Should it not be First and goal at 16. This is what he is asking.
I know exactly what he is asking and I answered the question. No, it definitely should not be first and goal. The refs were right in this instance. It should have been 1st and 10 at the 16 yard line.
quote:
But saying "new set of downs had not been established yet" is bull shite.
No, it isn't.
1
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:31 am to PurpleAndGold86
I know exactly what he is asking and I answered the question. No, it definitely should not be first and goal. The refs were right in this instance. It should have been 1st and 10 at the 16 yard line.
Giving the team the first and 10 negates the penalty of 15 yds you just gave them.
Essentially what happened is the team got a first down 9 yards closer than the previous play after getting a 15 yd penalty.
We did not stop the first down after that at any rate.
Giving the team the first and 10 negates the penalty of 15 yds you just gave them.
Essentially what happened is the team got a first down 9 yards closer than the previous play after getting a 15 yd penalty.
We did not stop the first down after that at any rate.
This post was edited on 11/12/14 at 9:35 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News