- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Crash at Burbank and E. Boyd
Posted on 9/30/14 at 3:59 pm to TigersforEver
Posted on 9/30/14 at 3:59 pm to TigersforEver
quote:If you add the arrow, you either need to add a turn lane or split the phasing between the two approaches. That means that one approach gets a green ball and a green arrow until the light turns red. Then the opposing approach gets the same indicators. This just increases the overall cycle length, so traffic on the main line has to sit longer.
Wouldn't it have been much easier to just add a left turn arrow to the existing signal?
2
Posted on 9/30/14 at 4:12 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
A source close to me informed me the light is going back up.
This post was edited on 9/30/14 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 9/30/14 at 5:45 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
If you add the arrow, you either need to add a turn lane or split the phasing between the two approaches. That means that one approach gets a green ball and a green arrow until the light turns red. Then the opposing approach gets the same indicators. This just increases the overall cycle length, so traffic on the main line has to sit longer.
Better to sit longer at a light cycle than have an accident blocking traffic make you sit indefinitely
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News