Started By
Message

re: Tomorrow Recreational red snapper season will end in your lifetime

Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:58 pm to
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:58 pm to
We have a response from the council. CaptBengal

Hi!

I'm an oceanographer that works in fisheries. Let's talk.

quote:
Let me give you background red snapper are admittedly not in trouble and everyone but NOAA claims they are more snapper now than anytime in history


this is simply false. Or are you going by people's fishing? Im going by models on population structure based on fisheries catches, environment, and survivorship.

quote:
Due to decline in shrimping which caused about 90% plus of them to be killed, millions in reef building, and decimated of predators like sharks


Shrimping is awful. It should be banned imho. However, these claims on why there would be more snapper now are false. We can go into more detail on each one if you like...

quote:
eliminating from fisherman costing billions of dollars and eliminating thousands of jobs.


You do realize they are trying to protect the industry for future years, right?

quote:
hey will divide the non-commercial sector into two parts one for recreational and the other for charter boats that hold a federal reef permit. (They quit issuing them in 2004 I believe. So if you don't have one you never will) then


This is the plan for all federally manged fisheries.

quote:
They will cancel recreational season for all non compliant states. (Everyone)


No they wont.

quote:
Magnuson Stevens Fisheries sustainability act.


Says nothing about eliminating recreational fisheries.

quote:
then they will move to eliminate recreational fishing in federal waters for Amberjack next, then other reef fisheries then to the pelagic fish like king mackerel tuna and cobia. Within 5 to 10 years there will be no or very limited fishing in federal waters.


They arent trying to "ban" anything. There are thousands of scientists tht fish, just like you and love it! It's the reason most of us got involved with the work in the first place. We have an ever increasing population with an ever increasing demand for protein. Most of that comes from the sea for the global population. At current rates we wont have fisheries capable of sustaining demand in 10 years.

Nobody is out to take away your fishing, we want to make sure your grandkids can go fishing too.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:06 pm to
Red Snapper Fishery - A Legislator's Case For State Management
POSTED ON AUGUST 20, 2014 BY REPRESENTATIVE HERB FRIERSON, MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATIVE SPORTSMEN'S CAUCUS
As an avid Mississippi Gulf Coast recreational angler, I'm dismayed that we've allowed red snapper management in the Gulf of Mexico to become so convoluted and polarized. Amendment 40, also known as "sector separation," currently before the Gulf Council seeks to drive a wedge between the charter/for-hire and private recreational angler as a solution to the inept federal management of red snapper. Mississippi is the perfect example of where, as the fish get bigger and the quota is reached more quickly, we have fewer days to fish. With virtually no red snapper reefs within Mississippi state waters, our recreational anglers are slowly being squeezed out of the fishery with ridiculously short federal seasons. However, the best solution the Gulf Council can come up with for recreational anglers is to squeeze even more anglers out of the fishery with sector separation? I think not - we can do better than that.

My solution would be to turn red snapper management over to the states. We need to give management of this important recreational and commercial species to agencies that will ensure evidence-based, scientific management for the benefit of all Americans. We can't afford to leave it in the hands of political bureaucrats who dictate which side wins while others lose. The states have proven they can successfully manage recreational fisheries for decades. Spotted seatrout in coastal Mississippi is just one of many examples of successful, state-based management of mixed sector fisheries.

Putting myself in the shoes of the charter/for-hire captain, I would pause to seriously think about what sector-separation means to me and my business before endorsing it as the saving grace. There are always more losers than winners in a catch-share system, which is clearly where this is all headed. Catch shares remind me of musical chairs at the county fair. Each time you go around, there's one less chair and one less person participating until, finally, only one person is left holding the pie. At some point, you're going to be share cropping for someone or some corporation if you hope to fish at all.

I want to be clear - I'm not against commercial or charter/for-hire fishermen. I'm simply against this heavy-handed approach that will only benefit a few while the possibility of finding a real solution to the problem for all anglers and coastal communities slips further and further away. Let the Gulf Council know that we can do better than that during the Biloxi, Mississippi meeting at the Beau Rivage Hotel and Casino on August 27th.

Representative Herb Frierson
Mississippi Legislative Sportsmen's Caucus


He wasnt even the legislator that spoke at the hearing.
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 7:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram