Started By
Message

re: Greg Maddux HOF selection question

Posted on 7/28/14 at 10:50 am to
Posted by Chitter Chatter
In and Out of Consciousness
Member since Sep 2009
4660 posts
Posted on 7/28/14 at 10:50 am to
I also don't know what to think about players being on the ballot for multiple years. Glad they reduced it from 15 to 10 years.... but a player doesn't get better from one year to another. Either they're HOF material or they're not.
Posted by oilfieldtiger
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Dec 2003
2904 posts
Posted on 7/28/14 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Glad they reduced it from 15 to 10 years
i have to feel they made that change to try and narrow the window that they (the BBWAA) has to deal w/ steroid tainted guys.

it just shows that even getting elected has it's quirks that are beyond the player's control and sometimes it just doesn't work out -- same as guys that play the wrong position for a long time, or an ill-timed injury, or were caught in the wrong team's minor league system.

hell, look at the shortage of guys from the WWII era. guys like Cecil Travis that seemed to be on their way, but whose careers were sidetracked by service. come to think of it, that would be a cool exhibit for the museum -- kind of a "greatness deferred" deal honoring ball players that saw combat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram