- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the Allies have won WWII without America getting involved?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 11:51 pm to Kcrad
Posted on 7/25/14 at 11:51 pm to Kcrad
quote:
The Germans would have destroyed the Soviet Union.
The Germans had already lost that front when they diverted the attack from Moscow to Stalingrad. By that time the Russians were beating the Germans strategically.
The allies couldn't have beaten Japan, but Germany would've fallen on the western front eventually. Colonialism being the reason why.. the Europeans, with allies, would've eventually outlasted the dwindling German numbers.
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 7/26/14 at 12:00 am to Boudin
[quote]Boudin Would the Allies have won WWII without America getting involved? quote: The Germans would have destroyed the Soviet Union. The Germans had already lost that front when they diverted the attack from Moscow to Stalingrad. By that time the Russians were beating the Germans strategically.
___________________________________________________
I agree that Stalingrad was a disaster and was only so important because it was named after Stalin. Shifting away from Moscow and the oil fields of the south were serious mistakes.
Give your line of thinking regarding the strategic aspects. Is it because of Japan not being a threat in the east?
___________________________________________________
I agree that Stalingrad was a disaster and was only so important because it was named after Stalin. Shifting away from Moscow and the oil fields of the south were serious mistakes.
Give your line of thinking regarding the strategic aspects. Is it because of Japan not being a threat in the east?
This post was edited on 7/26/14 at 12:01 am
Posted on 7/26/14 at 9:08 am to Boudin
quote:
The Germans had already lost that front when they diverted the attack from Moscow to Stalingrad. By that time the Russians were beating the Germans strategically.
Good post.
Splitting Army Group Center was the beginning of the end. The Germans take Moscow, it's all over.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)