Started By
Message

re: True Romance - Who would've been the better director? Tony Scott or Tarantino?

Posted on 7/24/14 at 11:51 am to
Posted by TDTGodfather
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6169 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 11:51 am to
quote:

When Clarence and Alabama escape the final showdown


not in the script btw, well at least half of them. i wouldve been ok with clarence not surviving and alabama having his baby etc. but the ending they went with was more hollywood and i didn't think it took away from the film.



quote:

Do you think the Tarantino non-linear approach would've been better than the Tony Scott approach

i don't know how tarantino approached the storyline (whether it was linear or not) but it absolutely was better in the final cut. clarence and alabama's relationship grows as the story progresses. it's a huge part of the story.



quote:

It would have had out of order chronology like Pulp Fiction, and Clarence would have died at the end.

shite i missed this my bad.

i definitely like the linear approach to this film. it's essential to view alabama and clarence growing as shite starts to happen to them.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 11:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram