- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: True Romance - Who would've been the better director? Tony Scott or Tarantino?
Posted on 7/24/14 at 11:51 am to mizzoukills
Posted on 7/24/14 at 11:51 am to mizzoukills
quote:
When Clarence and Alabama escape the final showdown
not in the script btw, well at least half of them. i wouldve been ok with clarence not surviving and alabama having his baby etc. but the ending they went with was more hollywood and i didn't think it took away from the film.
quote:
Do you think the Tarantino non-linear approach would've been better than the Tony Scott approach
i don't know how tarantino approached the storyline (whether it was linear or not) but it absolutely was better in the final cut. clarence and alabama's relationship grows as the story progresses. it's a huge part of the story.
quote:
It would have had out of order chronology like Pulp Fiction, and Clarence would have died at the end.
shite i missed this my bad.
i definitely like the linear approach to this film. it's essential to view alabama and clarence growing as shite starts to happen to them.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 11:56 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News