Started By
Message

re: Army Times - Bergdahl's attorney also fought for Army captain in espionage case

Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:48 pm to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

15-6 is an investigation or inquiry Article 32 is a pre trial hearing


Rgr. Most times we hear about a case in the Navy it's either Article 15 (NJP or Captain's Mast) or it's already an Article 32 investigation pending referral for court martial or dismissal. I wonder if the Army does it differently or if I just don't have much insight into our own legal processes.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 7:50 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:51 pm to
What you guys want to know about NJPs. I'm an expert.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:58 pm to
The 15-6 is usually used for more general inquiries- like what happened, the investigating officer may be looking for the specific facts, systematic issues, so in this case if a 15-6 officer is appointed he may be answering questions concerning how this can be stopped in the future, was there a failure in command.

The Article 32 investigating officer is looking at whether an individual should be brought up on charges- Should Berghdahl face Court Martial or something else.

Maybe the AR 15-6 is the same as the Navy Court of Inquiry, like what do you use if a ship runs aground, or a bunch of naval aviators have a massive blow out and offend some people.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 8:02 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram