- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Under the Skin (Scarlett Johansson's fully nude movie)
Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:41 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:41 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Watch the movie and report back with an honest critique
What movie? Under the Skin? That looks terrible (other than the ScarJo eye candy) - you've got a better chance of getting me to watch Sexy Beast - at least that had some "actors" in it.
ETA: But whether I watch the terrible movie or not - it won't make Glazer into a guy who could aspire to be a guy who pretends to be as good as Kubrick.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:17 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:you don't say
I would still hit it.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:02 am to Ace Midnight
Ace Midnight
Well, now you're just trolling. You come in here with a strong opinion of something you know nothing about. At least watch his movies before you feel confident in your opinion.
He's not pretending. Damn good director. And, if you missed it, he has a unique style all his own. There are scenes in this movie that are truly mindblowing.
quote:
What movie? Under the Skin? That looks terrible (other than the ScarJo eye candy) - you've got a better chance of getting me to watch Sexy Beast - at least that had some "actors" in it.
Well, now you're just trolling. You come in here with a strong opinion of something you know nothing about. At least watch his movies before you feel confident in your opinion.
quote:
it won't make Glazer into a guy who could aspire to be a guy who pretends to be as good as Kubrick
He's not pretending. Damn good director. And, if you missed it, he has a unique style all his own. There are scenes in this movie that are truly mindblowing.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:00 am to mizzoukills
quote:
come in here with a strong opinion of something you know nothing about.
I know for a fact that Jonathan Glazer is no Stanley Kubrick - whether he's consciously or unconsciously copying or mimicing Kubrick's style (I have seen that in other critiques of his work) is of no moment.
quote:
At least watch his movies before you feel confident in your opinion.
I don't have to watch the Transformers to know they're terrible. I'm not putting Glazer in the same league as Bay - so hear me out - first off, again, I would watch Sexy Beast before the others, and that's unlikely.
My gut check on Under the Skin is a straight Species rip-off with ScarJo in the lead. I'm not a big horror movie fan, anyway. This one gets decent (or better) reviews. But I don't have to watch it to know that Glazer is no Kubrick.
quote:
Damn good director.
You're not alone in this opinion. I'm glad you enjoy his work. Feel free to continue.
...still doesn't make him remotely as talented as Kubrick.
This post was edited on 7/17/14 at 11:01 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News