- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/5/14 at 3:01 pm to ByteMe
quote:
Can you explain this, please? I keep reading it, and it makes no sense to me
I think he is saying that no matter what it really was they damned sure weren't going to call it a terrorist attack.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 3:15 pm to ByteMe
quote:
Can you explain this, please? I keep reading it, and it makes no sense to me.
AA587 went down 11/12/2001, I was very close to this investigation, the most likely cause, or a least a major contributor, was a poorly designed rudder lockout system, the debris field was highly suspect as well, as certain parts were so far from where they should have been, and were not consistent with the aircraft simply "crashing" shortly after departure, that there was ample reason to investigate the possibility of terrorism, as the country was reeling from 9/11, and Airbus couldn't afford to have one of their fleets grounded, the blame was placed on the pilot, for "rudder walking," because it had the least economical/fear factor impact, a friend of mine flew that actual aircraft to JFK from SJU, the night before, and he was interrogated at length by the FAA, NTSB, FBI, AA, and Airbus, under the veiled implication that he had somehow sabotaged the plane
This post was edited on 7/5/14 at 3:20 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News