re: What is your criteria for determining a conferences' strength?

quote:

---

Korin

---

I always think I will be amazed at the ignorance but usually I never am...because it's like clockwork.

Look it up, chuckles. Laughing boy...idiot boy...mentally deficient.

Because laughing at my post...proved to the MSB that you are basically a retarded person.

If the SEC had won the last two baseball titles and most in history...they would say...we are the greatest thing since sliced bread.

But the Pac-12 has won the last two baseball titles...and 22 overall - compared to the SEC's 9.

Of which...one school - LSU, won 6 of them.

You take away all of USC's baseball titles - and the Pac-12 still leads the SEC 12-9.

In fact, in the last 10 years, the Pac-12 still leads the SEC 5-4.

Never has the SEC in the last 50 years ever lead or beat the Pac-12 at baseball in standings.

So, chuckles, how do you like them apples?

SEC claiming to the be the best baseball conference is like the Big10 claiming to be the best football conference the last 10 years.

Sure you get a lot of teams and media love - but you don't produce...

West Coast has won 6 of the last 10. Besides LSU...only Georgia and South Carolina has ever won shite in baseball since 1970.

Almost every Pac-12 team has won a title.

But don't let facts get in your way laughing boy chuckles. Ugh...

Doesn't anyone have a brain anymore on the MSB? Has the MSB become the Rant?

It's not hard to look shite up.