Started By
Message

re: What is your criteria for determining a conferences' strength?

Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:59 am to
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27327 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:59 am to
#1 SEC vs. #1 PAC 12
#2 SEC vs. #2 PAC 12

Etc. down the line.



Doing it like that, it's obvious which conference is the best...
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23139 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

#1 SEC vs. #1 PAC 12
#2 SEC vs. #2 PAC 12


I'd agree with this if 2 conferences played like this, but no one does this. There are a couple of games every year OOC that can give you a glimpse. For example this year in the B1G:

OSU/VT
MSU/Oregon
Wisky/LSU
UM/ND

OSU should win, and if they don't win by 10+, that will hurt the entire conference.

If MSU and/or Wisky win those games, it helps the conference a ton, since they are probably in similar spots in their conference (MSU 1 or 2 in the B1G and Oregon 1/2 in the PAC and Wisky/LSU in the 2-5 range in their conferences)

That's how I would do it in a perfect world, because I think it's hard to do without enough games between conferences

Vanderbilt > Indiana without seeing those 2 teams play each other.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram