re: Anti- science liberals vs anti-science conservatives: who is more dangerous?

My thoughts:
Anti-Vaccine: Obviously incredibly stupid and opens up others around us to disease. Another huge problem associated with liberal causes is allowing illegal aliens access to schools without documented vaccinations.

Anti GMO: Really this limits our progress as a society and could lead to famine in certain circumstances.

Anti Nuclear: Clear advantages as we continue to improve the technology. The worst part is their advocacy against central storage of waste materials. Making nuclear facilities store all materials locally is just increasing our exposure to either a severe accident or terrorist type actions.

Anti-Sexual differences: Really this is just a mental condition that will make mentally unstable males and females feel inadequate when they try to mimic the opposite sex.

Anti -evolution: Meh, but speaks to a group that can be influence to take illogical actions that may be much more dangerous.

Anti-AGW - Probably depends on what you mean by AGW. As temperature changes have slowed, if expect temperature changes to be gradual and oceans to rise (as the most serious concern) over centuries and not decades, i don't think this is a big deal. We can adapt. Most cities will need to replace all of their infrastructure over a century so gradual movement away from the current coastline shouldn't be that big of a deal.

Anti-Sexual preference - Obviously impacts "acceptance" of feelings. Similar to the far lefts ignorance of sexual norms, the opposite is dangerous in ignoring genetic abnormalities and the affects on the psyche of the individual.