- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti- science liberals vs anti-science conservatives: who is more dangerous?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:18 pm to Tiguar
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:18 pm to Tiguar
quote:
Widespread anti vaccine movement is more damaging than widespread GW disbelief. Both of our worries rely on what-ifs.
Not really.
Vaccines have ingredients. Ingredients that don't need to be in our bodies can be identified, there isn't an 'if' involved.
And global warming arguments are useless. Does the data matter? We need to be more responsible, and not in a bike path kinda way, this recognition has nothing to do with partisan arguments about global warming data.
4
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:21 pm to Sleeping Tiger
What negatives effects have vaccines caused? I think we already know the positives...
Better question, have vaccines had a more negative or positive effect on humanity?
Better question, have vaccines had a more negative or positive effect on humanity?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:22 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Vaccines have ingredients. Ingredients that don't need to be in our bodies can be identified, there isn't an 'if' involved.
DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE MANG OMG
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:24 pm to Sleeping Tiger
I'll take "ingredients that don't need to be in our bodies" over polio.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 9:15 pm to Sleeping Tiger
I had an IRL discussion recently with statist libs who blamed anti government libratarians for the anti vaxing
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News