- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:55 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:55 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
I am sorry for the confusion.
In a nutshell, I disagree that it cost more to remove a tenant than what they owe you in back rent . Only in a very unique circumstance would that be so.
My tenant owed me $2600 in back rent and refused to leave. It cost me $73 to legally remove him . And really nothing because the fee was added in the judgement against him.
In a nutshell, I disagree that it cost more to remove a tenant than what they owe you in back rent . Only in a very unique circumstance would that be so.
My tenant owed me $2600 in back rent and refused to leave. It cost me $73 to legally remove him . And really nothing because the fee was added in the judgement against him.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 2:05 pm to Dick Leverage
quote:
Only in a very unique circumstance would that be so.
There you go, so it is possible. And since we agree that it is possible, I would say that in the vast majority of those few cases, it's still worth it in order to secure your property. That's all I was trying to say. And in that sense the gov't spending $5 million to re-coup $1 million (or whatever) in back rent - and to secure their property, is not as unreasonable as some seem to be making it out to be. Sometimes you'll pay more than what you are owed to secure your property.
ETA: Look, here it is again, "Only the government would spend 1.5 million to collect a milljon" as if there isn't more to the eviction than simply collecting on back rent - there is also the issue of securing the property.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 2:20 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News