- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The McCutcheon decision, money as speech, and the end of corruption
Posted on 4/17/14 at 3:12 pm to Rex
Posted on 4/17/14 at 3:12 pm to Rex
Let me give you an illustration Mr. Bias Bot.yea BOT.
Why is it ok for newspappers to persuade citizens when they are 97 percent liberal, but you think ordinary citizens shouldn't have the same power.
When you and your ilk agree to a law that forbids newspapers and the liberal media from using all their power to get liberals elected, then and only then might I agree with some kind of election reform.
But you love the media bias, you don't think that giving Democrats free media plugs is wrong or that their attacking republicans continually is wrong. But you want to keep citizens from spending money that points out the truths they believe in.
So if the media rails against any position, be it coal, oil etc. etc. why shouldn't big business bw allowed to counter that spending?
What your ignorant azz should be afraid if is an unjust media that wields to much power, instead of tax payers who want to protect their interest.
Why is it ok for newspappers to persuade citizens when they are 97 percent liberal, but you think ordinary citizens shouldn't have the same power.
When you and your ilk agree to a law that forbids newspapers and the liberal media from using all their power to get liberals elected, then and only then might I agree with some kind of election reform.
But you love the media bias, you don't think that giving Democrats free media plugs is wrong or that their attacking republicans continually is wrong. But you want to keep citizens from spending money that points out the truths they believe in.
So if the media rails against any position, be it coal, oil etc. etc. why shouldn't big business bw allowed to counter that spending?
What your ignorant azz should be afraid if is an unjust media that wields to much power, instead of tax payers who want to protect their interest.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News