- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who would win between Rome and Ancient China?
Posted on 3/30/14 at 10:02 am to biglego
Posted on 3/30/14 at 10:02 am to biglego
quote:
There are plenty soldiers who accomplished more impressive feats. Spartans as you mention. But there's no reason to think a confederate soldier was better than a Mongol, Crusader, Macedonian, or 1500s Spaniard. It's hard to compare with pre-gunpowder soldiers but the confederate soldier was a poorly trained, hungry farmboy compared to the professional soldiers in history.
Mongol- Not soldiers, a horde of highly effective light cavalry.
Crusader- hard to dismiss, I have read some of their training manuals for knights and they were serious.
Macedonian- The best of the ones you mentioned and while not Spartans, I believe the Spartans were the best of that genre so I feel they are represented.
1500's Spaniard- a butcher who has no place in this discussion.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News