- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who would win between Rome and Ancient China?
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:43 pm to Peazey
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:43 pm to Peazey
quote:
His comment was pretty ludicrous,
I am not responding to the retard. But you are flat wrong, What makes my comment ludicrous? They consistently whipped the Yankees with less people, no fricking shoes, very little food, going into battle often times with as little as five rounds of ammunition, did I mention that their daily ration was about a third of what the union soldiers got? So can you please explain how my statement was Ludicrous.
2
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:51 pm to bencoleman
General Tso FTW
Posted on 3/29/14 at 10:00 pm to bencoleman
The south had better military leadership sure. That's what allowed them to do what you just said. But it's a southern fantasy that men in general were just better down here. You get any large enough group of people together and the general proportions of cowards and brave men are going to be about the same.
ETA: Sorry for lumping you in with that guy. You just happen to be talking about a brand of regionalism that I just don't buy into.
ETA: Sorry for lumping you in with that guy. You just happen to be talking about a brand of regionalism that I just don't buy into.
This post was edited on 3/29/14 at 10:03 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News