- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who would win between Rome and Ancient China?
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:21 pm to NoNameNeeded
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:21 pm to NoNameNeeded
quote:
Are you kidding? The Confederate soldiers lost due the fact they lacked the work ethic and strength of the German and Irish Midwesterners of the Union who never relied on slaves to do their alpha labor for them.
The Confederacy's laziness and sucking up to the elite aristocrats' interests made them less productive weaker than their Union counterparts.
Sorry, but there's a reason the North was victorious.
His comment was pretty ludicrous, but yours was just as crazy. The reason the North won was industry and many more people. Pretty simple.
1
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:43 pm to Peazey
quote:
His comment was pretty ludicrous,
I am not responding to the retard. But you are flat wrong, What makes my comment ludicrous? They consistently whipped the Yankees with less people, no fricking shoes, very little food, going into battle often times with as little as five rounds of ammunition, did I mention that their daily ration was about a third of what the union soldiers got? So can you please explain how my statement was Ludicrous.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News