- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question about the viability of the 2nd Amendment?
Posted on 1/29/14 at 4:08 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 1/29/14 at 4:08 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
That massive paragraph you are quoting is half wrong. A true insurgency does not seek to fight the opponent's military. If he does so it is only to tie down his resources and make him commit more of his forces to a certain area or effort. The real war will be nasty. It would be one of murder, assassination and terror. The easy "soft" targets will be struck. The logistics and support areas would be terrorized. The economy would be crippled. The government would be collapsed in less than a year. It would be a no win situation for the government. For everyone really.
It sounds like you might have seen some of this before
I always hate these hypothetical Qs, because people just don't understand how fricking terrible insurgencies are for EVERYONE. Not only are families and bystanders fair game, they are prime targets. It is these circumstances which breed the terrorism we so despise. At some point it always becomes the most effective option.
1
Posted on 1/29/14 at 4:31 pm to MrCarton
quote:
It sounds like you might have seen some of this before
Not bad for a dumb jarhead huh?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News