For the OSU 24-0 argument....

tOSU deserves to be in the game if they beat MSU. Likewise, they will be. Auburn needed a prayer to beat Georgia.

Auburn has a loss. OSU doesn't. Pretty fking simple to understand.

quote:

---

Did Auburn just not beat the 2 time defending champ that was 28-1 before tonight's game?

Also won 3 of 4 national championships

Yeah buckeyes, your shite is weak.

BTW, how many ranked teams have you beat out of those 24?

---

Yes, Auburn beat Bama tonight. This is the same Bama people have said shouldn't be a 2X defending champ cause they should never have made the game in 2011. This is the same Bama team who has lost AT HOME 2 years in a row. This is the same Bama team who was well behind KSU, ND and Oregon last year when they had one loss, and they were defending national champs.

Auburn has won 5 games over teams with winning records. OSU has 6.

OSU, if they win next week, will likely have won games against 2-3 teams who will be ranked going into bowl games (If Iowa ends up in the 20-25 range which they may well do). Auburn will have...wins over 3 ranked teams when bowl games
begin (LSU, Bama and Mizzou) ole miss and UGA will not be ranked likely.

I've tried to make as objective an argument as I can. I think the real issue is that if you have an undefeated team from a BCS conference get left out this year, what is the point to even playing the season? The SEC automatically gets a team in if they only have 1 loss?

edit: one more. OSU and PSU were not bowl eligible last year, 2 of the best 4 teams in the conference. It is hard to win Bowl games anyway, and much harder when everyone is slotted 2 bowl games higher than they should. The B1G may not have had a better record, but OSU would have been in the Rose, knocking Wisky and Michigan down a notch, making the games more competitive