Started By
Message

re: Someone explain WHY the watered-down offense was necessary. Thanks.

Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:00 am to
Posted by Bear Is Dead
Monroe
Member since Nov 2007
4696 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:00 am to
The offense wasn't that watered down. We just didn't execute very well in the passing game. After a while, it didn't make sense to risk the win for passing stats. Seriously, this game could have easily been 28-6. We were clearly the better team.
Posted by lob1284
Houma by birth
Member since Mar 2006
4928 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:03 am to
Best secondary in the country. Jarvis basically playing on 1 leg. They can't stop our run. Our o-line was mashing them. Not afraid to punt more in this game, because it was evident pretty early they were going to have a hard time driving the length of the field on our D.

Conservative game plan, but the game never felt in doubt from the time we scored that first TD.
Posted by cajunjj
Madison, AL
Member since May 2008
7427 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:05 am to
The passing game wasn't that good in this game. We knew we could run on them, why pass? Also Fla. corners were really good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram