- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NCAA Playoff Committee Selected
Posted on 10/14/13 at 5:48 pm to VermilionTiger
Posted on 10/14/13 at 5:48 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
2008...choose 4
Realistically, you can't. I'd say Florida, Oklahoma, Texas and Southern Cal, but that's post-hoc speaking. (OU and Texas won their bowl games while TT didn't *and* TT played the weakest opponent of the three; Southern Cal blew out Penn State in the Rose Bowl; the rest either come from AQ conferences and are the product of soft schedules, or lost their bowl game to aforesaid undeserving teams.) Making an argument at the time would have been virtually impossible.
4 is better on the whole, though. This and 2007 were the exceptions to the rule. I'd probably favor a 6-team playoff (top 2 teams get 1st-wk BYEs), but that's as far as it should go. (With six teams you add Alabama and Utah/Penn State/Texas Tech and call it a playoff in 08.)
The best thing that could be done is a variable-number playoff. For your 2002, 2005 type seasons, just do #1 vs #2. For your 2011 type seasons, do 4-team playoff. For your 2007 and 2008 seasons, do 8-team.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)