- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone have a take on the Stanford vs. Washington ending?
Posted on 10/8/13 at 8:51 pm to TDawg1313
Posted on 10/8/13 at 8:51 pm to TDawg1313
quote:
If our special teams didn't suck that day, we would have won anyways. We beat them in 2 of the 3 phases of the game (outgained them 489 to 279), but they smashed us in the 3rd phase.
The problem with this analysis is that they did beat you with special tams. That gave them a two score lead for most of the second half. If the game had been tied, Stanford doesn't go into a shell offensively. Shaw called that game not to lose. In the end he didn't pay for it.
This post was edited on 10/8/13 at 8:56 pm
1
Posted on 10/9/13 at 12:48 am to bisonduck
quote:
The problem with this analysis is that they did beat you with special tams. That gave them a two score lead for most of the second half. If the game had been tied, Stanford doesn't go into a shell offensively. Shaw called that game not to lose. In the end he didn't pay for it.
I can give you the conservative play calling for maybe the last 8 minutes or so of the 4th quarter, but they aren't closing up shop on the offensive side of the ball for "most of the second half". And yes, they did beat us on special teams and very badly. That was the major reason that we lost the game.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News