Started By
Message

re: Eric Bledsoe's Trade Value

Posted on 4/24/13 at 4:22 pm to
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
35777 posts
Posted on 4/24/13 at 4:22 pm to
Bledsoe would be an upgrade over Vasquez, but not a significant enough upgrade to justify overpaying for him or giving away too much.

If we're giving up a lot, I'd rather shoot for Wilson chandler or at least make an attempt at cousins.
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13131 posts
Posted on 4/24/13 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Bledsoe would be an upgrade over Vasquez, but not a significant enough upgrade to justify overpaying for him or giving away too much.


Ya, you don't want to pay too much for anyone if you can avoid it.

...I think Bledsoe is worth Lopez and a #15-20 pick, easily. He could be the perfect over-performing starter on a pretty good contract (like Anderson) to go along with our studs--Davis and Gordon(??)

quote:

I'd rather make an attempt at cousins.


Me too, but that's not happening...New ownership will want to hold on to their best player.

quote:

Wilson chandler


I like him too, but he carries some questions as well (similar to Bledsoe)--started 14 games total over the last two seasons.

There's no real proof that he would be significantly better than an average starter for us....I think he would be, just like Bledsoe.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram