- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/21/13 at 5:23 pm to mattz1122
quote:
Let's put political biases aside. Costas's hairpiece covers more and appears much less greasy. This really isn't a debate
Obviously you are completely ignorant about hairpieces:
1) Greasy is better. It's much easier to pass of a hairpiece when the wet look is in. This goes back to George Raft in the '30s. The dry look exposes the fraud more.
2) Michaels' is in fact a "hairpiece", a small covering of a certain area. Costas' is more of a rug.
3) Michael's piece follows the contours of his head much better. Costas seems to have borrowed an old rug of Bill Gates. It doesn't fit the front of his head at all.
4) Michaels wears only a small piece to give off the My-hairline-is-receding-but-I'm-not-bald-yet vibe. At least he's less dishonest than BC.
5) Costas dyes what hair he has (the old Paul McCartney twofer), and when his dye job didn't turn out too well, he had to wear a rug that matched. This made him like his hair had turned (as Gerald Ford allegedly said about Ronald Reagan) "prematurely orange".
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News