Started By
Message

re: The Big Four (plus one), Examined

Posted on 1/28/13 at 9:41 pm to
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

when did he lose a french final? The one time he didn't win it he lost to Soderling in a earlier round (1/4 final I think)



Yup. My mistake.
Posted by dunkelman
shreveport
Member since Oct 2005
1382 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 10:01 pm to
Somewhat unfair to compare these over extended periods of time. Fed is 6 years older than the other guys. There was a time when he was untouchable. He dominated pretty much everyone for number of years. 17 majors don't lie. In addition, he one on every surface which in think is a testament to the player. Not nearly as much of a specialist as Nadal.

Lendl coulT win on clay. Mac couldn't win on clay. Either could Pete. I think winning then French strongly bolstered his claim to greatest of all time.

You post shows is the amount of parity at the top of the men's game. Very hard to dominate these days. It's really the glory days as far as a spectator sport butvthe non-tennis sports fans in the States because no American is a real and constant factor in this discussion.
Posted by bddwolfpack
NYC
Member since Sep 2010
9407 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 10:05 pm to
I clicked on this thread expecting it to be about the college football playoff system.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram