Started By
Message

re: Tiger Stadium vs. The Superdome

Posted on 9/18/12 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 9/18/12 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

except that the Dome was only measured on the field during the 3rd quarter

lack of data doesn't equal a victory


Right. But if I am taking the Tiger Stadium side of this argument, I can confidently state that Tiger Stadium has higher recorded decibel levels than the Superdome. Meanwhile, if you were taking the Superdome side of the argument, you would have to contend that there were some other unspecified point in time when the Superdome noise levels exceeded 119 decibels on the field...even though there are no measurements or other empirical data to support that contention...and even though that contention is based entirely on your own subjective experience of the Dome, which is influenced by bias and emotional factors. That's all I'm sayin'.

In any event, this topic isn't all that dear to me. As long as everyone acknowledges that TS is the loudest venue in college football.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/18/12 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

In any event, this topic isn't all that dear to me. As long as everyone acknowledges that TS is the loudest venue in college football.


wouldn't the empirical data suggest Wisconsin's stadium? It reached 135 i believe

can't find a link for it, so may not be true
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 12:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram