- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do the idiots keep saying the coaches and front office admitted it?
Posted on 6/21/12 at 10:33 am to LSForYou
Posted on 6/21/12 at 10:33 am to LSForYou
Linked in another thread, but i thought it fit here as well..
link
link
quote:
Vitt confirmed that he told league investigators that the Saints used terms like "cart-offs" and "whacks" (a legal hit that didn't result in injury), among other such details. Vitt, however, said he did not corroborate any of the league's more sweeping claims that the team had a "bounty" system in place.
quote:
Vitt again stressed that he had never heard the word "bounty" until the NFL's investigators brought up the term earlier this year. And he denied the existence of any bounties or any bounty program being in place. Vitt admitted that a pay-for-performance program was in place but said the league never asked about a pay-for-performance program - which means he wasn't intentionally lying when he denied the existence of a "bounty" program.
quote:
When asked why he and other suspended members of the Saints' management and coaching staff didn't put up much of a public fight when they were punished earlier this year, Vitt again said he didn't want to comment since the players' appeals process is still ongoing, but he said he would comment in the future. And he said part of the reason is that the coaches don't have the same kind of appeals process available to them that players have - and certainly not that most average people have available.
Posted on 6/21/12 at 11:47 am to TiegerTim
quote:
You know the three in Buffalo...oh wait, that was Carolina...oh wait, the only injury that game was to a defensive player. The NFL's case is full of...oh wait's
Don't forget the supposed $200 for "whacks" to Dunbar and Harper in the playoff game against the Lions. Did anyone ever figure out what those "whacks" were??
Posted on 6/21/12 at 8:23 pm to TiegerTim
quote:
Vitt confirmed that he told league investigators that the Saints used terms like "cart-offs" and "whacks" (a legal hit that didn't result in injury), among other such details. Vitt, however, said he did not corroborate any of the league's more sweeping claims that the team had a "bounty" system in place.
where does the NFL say bounty?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)