Started By
Message

re: The ATL Thread

Posted on 4/23/12 at 1:45 pm to
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 4/23/12 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't want to see us go 5 years with Swisher, he's getting up there in age. 3 years with a 4th option would be ideal. He would fit perfectly in LF.


Yeah, he's 31, so not young, but not old either. He'd be the best option in terms of cost vs. age, IMO. Because JHam is gonna cost a shite ton and is actually older anyhow.
Posted by auyushu
Surprise, AZ
Member since Jan 2011
8606 posts
Posted on 4/23/12 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

eah, he's 31, so not young, but not old either. He'd be the best option in terms of cost vs. age, IMO. Because JHam is gonna cost a shite ton and is actually older anyhow.



Yeah, he'd be 32 at the start of a contract with us. I'm not really a fan of any decent sized contract to a player past 35/36, as that's when a majority of position players really start to break down.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram