- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Renderings of expansion from LSU
Posted on 4/19/12 at 9:30 am to MetTiger
Posted on 4/19/12 at 9:30 am to MetTiger
The correct idea for the exterior is there, but in the official renderings they didn't execute it well at all.
The difference with the north's exterior is that it is shorter in height than the south expansion renderings (thus it looks stretched out and a bit off). They need to have the arches at a shorter height if they want to duplicate the north endzone in the new extension, then figure out a way to build the new upper deck on top of the "colosseum"portion.
The difference with the north's exterior is that it is shorter in height than the south expansion renderings (thus it looks stretched out and a bit off). They need to have the arches at a shorter height if they want to duplicate the north endzone in the new extension, then figure out a way to build the new upper deck on top of the "colosseum"portion.
This post was edited on 4/19/12 at 9:32 am
2
Posted on 4/19/12 at 9:36 am to MaravichManiac
quote:
The correct idea for the exterior is there, but in the official renderings they didn't execute it well at all.
The difference with the north's exterior is that it is shorter in height than the south expansion renderings (thus it looks stretched out and a bit off). They need to have the arches at a shorter height if they want to duplicate the north endzone in the new extension, then figure out a way to build the new upper deck on top of the "colosseum"portion.
^This
Posted on 4/19/12 at 9:50 am to MaravichManiac
quote:
The correct idea for the exterior is there, but in the official renderings they didn't execute it well at all.
Well, it's just renderings.
quote:
The difference with the north's exterior is that it is shorter in height than the south expansion renderings (thus it looks stretched out and a bit off). They need to have the arches at a shorter height if they want to duplicate the north endzone in the new extension, then figure out a way to build the new upper deck on top of the "colosseum"portion.
Not possible. The SEZ already has enough weight as is technically has an upperdeck on top of the original stadium already. This new addition has to stand alone as far as support structures go. And of course it's going to taller than the NEZ as that side won't have an upper deck. There's no way to scale the new SEZ to the NEZ and just throw an upper deck up there.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News