Started By
Message

re: Sure Wish LSU Was Playing Stanford or OSU

Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:20 pm to
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
77877 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

OSU's schedule was inflated with the likes of Baylor and KSU, which are good but not great teams. The BCS isn't defined by body of work, and I imagine most people who vote do so for the best team, not the one who has the best body of work. You can look at the wins all you want, but look at the losses as well, Iowa State b

Iowa state isnt good but they arent Tulan either. Didnt they make a crappy bowl?

I'm pretty sure Bama is indeed the second best team and would defeat Okie. But there is no way to judge "best team" without looking at what the teams accomplished. The season has to matter. Otherwise lets just use recruiting rankings. Thats what happened in 2006. Most thought Mich was second best team according to the eyeball test. The eyeball test gave OhioSt no shot against Miami in 2002. the eyeball test wouldve left out lsu in 2007 bc UGA and USC both were looking better, but thankfully voters looked at lsu's wins--NOT losses--and the fact lsu won the SEC.

Fact is, if it were OK instead of Okie, Bama wouldve been left out. Bc in every other season, a one-loss Big12 champ gets in.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
266203 posts
Posted on 1/3/12 at 12:21 am to
quote:


Iowa state isnt good but they arent Tulan either. Didnt they make a crappy bowl?


Most teams at least made a crappy bowl.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram