- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LCD or Plasma for TV for gaming?
Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:13 am to kick2theface
Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:13 am to kick2theface
Plasma Refresh rate is very misleading. 600hz my arse. Divide that by 5 and thats what you get. Yes, 120hz. Look it up. Plus, there arent even many games and such out there that even support higher refresh rates. Take a 120hz and be happy with it. As for "TV lag", There is a setting on most TVs that is made just for gaming. On my Samsung TV it is called "Game Mode"--completely fixed the problem.
FWIW, cable and sat only broadcast in 60hz.
FWIW, cable and sat only broadcast in 60hz.
1
Posted on 12/12/11 at 11:34 am to RougeTiger
I think argument needs to be more between LED and Plasma.
But yeah, I feel like LEDs seem to have the better lighting, are thinner, and use less energy.
Plasmas look good as well but have lighting issues, are bigger, and weight more, and use more energy.
But yeah, I feel like LEDs seem to have the better lighting, are thinner, and use less energy.
Plasmas look good as well but have lighting issues, are bigger, and weight more, and use more energy.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News