- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BCS "fix" question - the "+1"
Posted on 12/8/11 at 9:37 am to cnote
Posted on 12/8/11 at 9:37 am to cnote
College Football is truly unique from all of the other sports. Each year seems to end with a unique scenario. There doesn't seem to be one system that will "get it right" 100% of the time.
If we had a +1 system this year (aka, a 4 team playoff), who would have been chosen? LSU, Bama, Okie St., and ... Stanford? Va Tech? Boise St? (an undefeated Houston, if they had won?), (a one loss Oregon, if they had won?). There would still be the need for the BCS poll system, with coaches pimping for their school, coaches manipulating their votes, Harris voters being dumbasses, ESPN pimping for their favorite high profile teams, and super-secret computer polls that are super-retarded.
Other years would have different issues.
It would be difficult to create, but I think there should be an "if needed" type variable system, with a selction committee (like in college baseball and basketball). The selection committee would not only choose which teams would participate, but would also choose the type of playoff that would be suitable for that season's end of the year scenario.
This year, a three team playoff would probable be best, with Bama and Okie State facing off, while LSU would get a bye.
If we had a +1 system this year (aka, a 4 team playoff), who would have been chosen? LSU, Bama, Okie St., and ... Stanford? Va Tech? Boise St? (an undefeated Houston, if they had won?), (a one loss Oregon, if they had won?). There would still be the need for the BCS poll system, with coaches pimping for their school, coaches manipulating their votes, Harris voters being dumbasses, ESPN pimping for their favorite high profile teams, and super-secret computer polls that are super-retarded.
Other years would have different issues.
It would be difficult to create, but I think there should be an "if needed" type variable system, with a selction committee (like in college baseball and basketball). The selection committee would not only choose which teams would participate, but would also choose the type of playoff that would be suitable for that season's end of the year scenario.
This year, a three team playoff would probable be best, with Bama and Okie State facing off, while LSU would get a bye.
Posted on 12/8/11 at 9:43 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
If we had a +1 system this year (aka, a 4 team playoff), who would have been chosen? LSU, Bama, Okie St., and ... Stanford? Va Tech? Boise St? (an undefeated Houston, if they had won?), (a one loss Oregon, if they had won?). There would still be the need for the BCS poll system, with coaches pimping for their school, coaches manipulating their votes, Harris voters being dumbasses, ESPN pimping for their favorite high profile teams, and super-secret computer polls that are super-retarded.
This is why the only way to get a "True" National Champion is a 16 team playoff.
That way you are guaranteed 3-5 teams to be in that probably don't deserve to be considered, but you get the top 8-10 that do deserve it and a couple that deserve it but don't have the record to normally get a look.
Out of a 16 team playoff, a true champion emerges. Nothing short of that is practically fair.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News