Most of my arguments weren't directed toward you. It was directed toward another poster who comes on an LSU board and brags about being loaded at QB minus Tannehill and having the best o-line in the country without any palpable facts. I've seen it mentioned several times by different Aggie posters but none could state anything that could substantiate these claims. I'm not limited to outsiders as I called out a guy who said Deangelo Peterson is one the best TE's in cfb without any base.

It was directed toward this post:

quote:
We are LOADED at QB and have one of the best QB coaches in the country. As far as running the ball, our entire OL returns and will be one of the Top5, if not the #1, OL in the country

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by StrickAggie06

College Station

Member since Sep 2011

597 posts

Posted on 10/24/11 at 11:23 am to coldhotwings

The problem is that you are exaggerating my statements. When I said we are loaded at QB, obviously I meant talent wise since none of them could have any significant amount of experience. We have a very good QB coach, as evidenced by how well Tannehill was able to step in mid season last year, and I was inferring that our starter next season should fare reasonably well. Your insistence that we are guarenteed to lose at MSU just because we have a new starter at QB has far less facts to back it up than anything I have claimed.

As far as our OL goes, I said top 5. I did not say it WOULD be the #1, I said it COULD be. Obviously lsu and bama both have outstanding lines and its very possible they could be #1 and #2 next year with us elsewhere in the top 5. Before this past Sat, we were tied 3rd for fewest sacks allowed at 3 and are averaging well over 200 yds per game on the ground. Given how young the OL, it is pretty reasonable to assume they will be one of the best next season.

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Conference Expansion - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board