- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Missouri would be a mistake; Clemson or FSU needed to preserve SEC
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:00 pm to adono
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:00 pm to adono
quote:
1. The ACC now has a $20 million exit fee.
2. The ACC is as stable as the SEC.
3. The ACC per team revenue is within shouting distance of the per team share in the SEC.
4. Florida and S. Carolina don't want Florida State and Clemson in their back yard.
All true, but a couple points I'd like to make.
First, I think it may have something to do with the fact that the SEC is substantially harder to be one of the 2 BCS teams in that winning the ACC. Maybe FSU and Clemson are a little hesitant because of that as well, though I expect FSU will reemerge as one of the elites in the next few years.
Another thing is I hate the argument that UF and USCe don't want them in. Man the frick up and show what you can do when you have to work harder. Bama/Auburn seems to work out fine as does MSU/OM though both are mostly irrelevant. I seriously do not think that FSU in particular is going to pull in that many more top recruits just because of moving to the SEC. They were already #1 last year
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)