- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 343 yards in 2010, 349 in 2011
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:10 pm to tigerfoot
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:10 pm to tigerfoot
ok, I was bored during the Green Bay game so I dug through this...I took the first 4 games this year (didn't include NWST), the first 4 last year, and the last 4 last year (minus ULM).
Here are the key factors affecting this year...
2011
TD's - 15
FG's - 6
Turnovers - 2
Off. Penalties - 7
2010 First Four
TD's - 9
FG's - 9
Turnovers - 9
Off. Penalties - 15
2010 Last Four
TD's - 14
FG's - 11
Turnovers - 6
Off. Penalties - 13
Starting Field Position
2011 - 38
2010 First Four - 43
2010 Last Four - 38
And one last stat, percent actual yards gained to potential yards (sum of all starting positions to goal line)
2011 - 41.3%
2010 First Four - 43.8%
2010 Last Four - 50.1%
Basically the differences boil down to a reduction in mistakes which leads to a much better TD/FG ratio. IMO, most of this is due to the OC change and playcalling philosophy, much more than any player change.
Here are the key factors affecting this year...
2011
TD's - 15
FG's - 6
Turnovers - 2
Off. Penalties - 7
2010 First Four
TD's - 9
FG's - 9
Turnovers - 9
Off. Penalties - 15
2010 Last Four
TD's - 14
FG's - 11
Turnovers - 6
Off. Penalties - 13
Starting Field Position
2011 - 38
2010 First Four - 43
2010 Last Four - 38
And one last stat, percent actual yards gained to potential yards (sum of all starting positions to goal line)
2011 - 41.3%
2010 First Four - 43.8%
2010 Last Four - 50.1%
Basically the differences boil down to a reduction in mistakes which leads to a much better TD/FG ratio. IMO, most of this is due to the OC change and playcalling philosophy, much more than any player change.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:20 pm to ForeLSU
Thanks for the research Fore.
The percentage of yards available that were gained is neat. I would have lost that bet.
Good info, suprising to me.
The percentage of yards available that were gained is neat. I would have lost that bet.
Good info, suprising to me.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:27 pm to ForeLSU
I'd have really thought that this yr's team would have had a better avg starting field position. interesting.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:27 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
IMO, most of this is due to the OC change and playcalling philosophy, much more than any player change.
oh ok
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News