- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: the SEC if you were God
Posted on 9/21/11 at 6:52 pm to tigersnducks
Posted on 9/21/11 at 6:52 pm to tigersnducks
14 Teams:
Kentucky
VaTech
Tennessee
South Carolina
Vandy
Ole Miss
Alabama
Texas A&M
LSU
MSU
Auburn
Florida
Clemson
Georgia
Kentucky
VaTech
Tennessee
South Carolina
Vandy
Ole Miss
Alabama
Texas A&M
LSU
MSU
Auburn
Florida
Clemson
Georgia
Posted on 9/21/11 at 7:18 pm to Tawanda
add A&M, Mizzou to the West
add Florida St. and Virginia Tech to the East
add Florida St. and Virginia Tech to the East
Posted on 9/21/11 at 7:20 pm to Tawanda
West division:
LSU
A&M
Mizzou
Arkansas
Central division:
Ole Miss
Miss. St
Alabama
Auburn
South division:
Florida
Georgia
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
North division:
UNC
Va Tech
USCe
Kentucky
Balanced divisions (don't split up the largest rivalries and keep one out-of-division rivalry intact yearly for each team), maybe switching Tennessee for Kentucky because that is the division with the most history. It also accomplishes everything the money men want: more markets, more teams that have respectable, profitable athletic programs, all within the region, all in new states, and they don't create a conference that is literally impossible to escape without two losses like adding FSU, Oklahoma, Texas, w/e might.
The other thing that makes it work neatly is that the oldest traditional cross-divisional rivalries are between the Central and the South - so you have the potential to either pair those two divisions up one one side of a four-team divisional champion bracket late in the season, adding the excitement that a playoff elimination game from a traditional rivalry would bring to the table, or you can just make an elaborate series of tiebreakers that function to eliminate the champion of one of those divisions if the divisional champions have identical win-loss, and do something similar with the new teams, creating new cross-divisional yearly matchups which could be lots of fun.
LSU
A&M
Mizzou
Arkansas
Central division:
Ole Miss
Miss. St
Alabama
Auburn
South division:
Florida
Georgia
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
North division:
UNC
Va Tech
USCe
Kentucky
Balanced divisions (don't split up the largest rivalries and keep one out-of-division rivalry intact yearly for each team), maybe switching Tennessee for Kentucky because that is the division with the most history. It also accomplishes everything the money men want: more markets, more teams that have respectable, profitable athletic programs, all within the region, all in new states, and they don't create a conference that is literally impossible to escape without two losses like adding FSU, Oklahoma, Texas, w/e might.
The other thing that makes it work neatly is that the oldest traditional cross-divisional rivalries are between the Central and the South - so you have the potential to either pair those two divisions up one one side of a four-team divisional champion bracket late in the season, adding the excitement that a playoff elimination game from a traditional rivalry would bring to the table, or you can just make an elaborate series of tiebreakers that function to eliminate the champion of one of those divisions if the divisional champions have identical win-loss, and do something similar with the new teams, creating new cross-divisional yearly matchups which could be lots of fun.
This post was edited on 9/21/11 at 7:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)