re: Basis for changing QB's...What makes sense?

quote:

---

There is a controversy about who the starting QB should be if the previous starting QB returns early enough in the season

---

no there isnt... just a couple posters here WANT a controversy... two different things bro.

quote:

---

JJ also did well against Bama's secondary, which wasn't lights out, but was certainly better than Oregon's or State's.

---

He completed one pass that acounted for half his yardage total. But ok whatever you say.

quote:

---

3. Our offense would have been dysfunctional with just about any average QB at the helm. The lines were not very good (especially in 09'), the running game sucked in 09'. JJ was one of the the only players on the offense who carried his weight. His QB rating was 37th by years end, and he led the nation in redzone efficiency. And Lee's a better pure passer. No one is disputing that. But MState and Oregon still stacked the line. 8 or 9 in at times. Our O line is just that much better this year.

---

I dont even know what to say... 2yrs ago means what today? I dont get it.

quote:

---

4. I'm support JJ because he's still a player and I think he probably got a raw deal (though I doubt that his hands are completely clean).

---

I dont think anyone here doesnt support JJ.. most just dont want him as the qb anymore. Not really that hard to understand.

quote:

---

So what kind of sense does that make?

---

none.. zero.