- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Better Pro RB: Scott or Keiland
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:43 pm to OBUDan
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:43 pm to OBUDan
quote:
You do realize he's 235 pounds, right?
Make me a list of 235 RBs in the league.
Lendale White is one. What would you call him?
explain why 235 = good nfl rb?
like i said, he may be a bruiser in college, but he's not going to be mowing down linebackers in the nfl.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:47 pm to harper6464
quote:
explain why 235 = good nfl rb?
like i said, he may be a bruiser in college, but he's not going to be mowing down linebackers in the nfl.
Explain to me where I said 235 = good nfl rb?
You said he won't be a bruiser in the NFL because presumably, he's not big enough?
He weighs 235. As much as post-tequila Lendale White. Who is known as... a bruiser. And he's shorter than White, so more compact.
My point is that there's only one 270 pound bruiser in the NFL - Brandon Jacobs.
If you look at almost every other "bruiser" they are Scott's size. And if you look at Scott's mentality... he runs with a lot of physicality. It's why he was worn down at the end of the last year and his production slowed.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)