- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who has/had more potential: Clayton or Randle?
Posted on 4/4/09 at 6:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/4/09 at 6:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Randle Slow
I would say RR, being that MC came in and played significantly as a true frosh without us having as many receivers as we do now. If RR really can come in and be a solid #3 with the talent we have here, then I would say he is destined to be better. Carl is right on though in that Clayton was so much more than a good receiver. Without him, who's to say the receivers behind him don't take blocking down field as seriously? He showed that being a hard-nosed football player coupled with talent can turn you into a 1st rounder.
I would say RR, being that MC came in and played significantly as a true frosh without us having as many receivers as we do now. If RR really can come in and be a solid #3 with the talent we have here, then I would say he is destined to be better. Carl is right on though in that Clayton was so much more than a good receiver. Without him, who's to say the receivers behind him don't take blocking down field as seriously? He showed that being a hard-nosed football player coupled with talent can turn you into a 1st rounder.
This post was edited on 4/4/09 at 6:41 pm
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News