- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RPI Rant
Posted on 2/12/09 at 3:13 pm to bayoubengals88
Posted on 2/12/09 at 3:13 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
Georgetown [13-9 (4-7), RPI: 34, SOS: 2] If not for playing the country's second-toughest schedule, Georgetown probably wouldn't even be in the at-large discussion.
I could say the exact opposite. If Gtown played chumps, they'd have a better record.
2
Posted on 2/12/09 at 3:34 pm to LuckyLee
quote:
I could say the exact opposite. If Gtown played chumps, they'd have a better record.
Agreed. If they played the 120th toughest schedule in the country they'd probably be something like 19-4, 20-3, 21-2?
Posted on 2/12/09 at 3:57 pm to LuckyLee
quote:
I could say the exact opposite. If Gtown played chumps, they'd have a better record.
You could say that, but you wouldn't say that based on statistical facts. Thus its an argument of a qualitative nature, which is fine. But it is messed up when the main statistical method used to rank teams by the selection committee is tweaked to emphasize that type of argument.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News