- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/15/24 at 9:54 pm to minister of truth
quote:
True that was determined for a reason, but those reasons are not always based on facts or science.
K. What was the reason? Is it just that the VA takes such good care of veterans?
Posted on 5/15/24 at 9:55 pm to MightyYat
quote:
presumption
If you don't know what you're talking about, just be quiet.
quote:
Joe lied
Yep, he's a piece of shite. That has frick all to do with Beau and his service.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:01 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I don’t know the reason anymore than you do. What I’m trying to say is that just because there’s a presumption doesn’t indicate that it’s fact. It was probably presumed because of increased rates of cancer among those young servicemen, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that those increased rates are due to burn pits. Correlation does not equal causation. Just like Gulf War syndrome decades later is thought to be due to chemical exposure, not depleted uranium. I’ve worked with ionizing radiation for over 30 years and if I develop cancer, it may be presumed to be secondary to the radiation yet not necessarily true
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:04 pm to minister of truth
Yeah, that's nice. Yet, it's still considered a presumptive condition related to burn pit exposure.
No one said that means it's guaranteed to have caused the cancer, but it does mean that anyone acting like it couldn't have caused it is a moron.
That's the point.
No one said that means it's guaranteed to have caused the cancer, but it does mean that anyone acting like it couldn't have caused it is a moron.
That's the point.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:07 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Your comprehension skills are subpar. I never said that burn pits didn’t cause cancer. I was merely making a point that presumption does not mean fact. You obviously enjoy arguing
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:09 pm to minister of truth
You aren't the only one in the thread, sport.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:10 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
What the frick does that mean sport?
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:13 pm to minister of truth
It means the scope of the thread goes beyond whatever point you think you're making. I didn't say presumptive conditions mean there's a direct cause. That's a point you injected for whatever reason. Then, you want to whine about the inverse.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:17 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Ok junior. You obviously live to argue on this board
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:18 pm to minister of truth
You made an idiotic assumption. I called it out. It can end there...or we can argue all night.
Up to you.
Up to you.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:19 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
If you don't know what you're talking about, just be quiet.
You said its a story told based on presumption, no?
quote:.
Yep, he's a piece of shite. That has frick all to do with Beau and his service
No one is shitting on Beau for his service. You have some misdirected hostility all over this thread.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:21 pm to MightyYat
quote:
You said its a story told based on presumption, no?
No.
I'm talking about presumptive conditions that are service-connected by the VA based on evidence.
quote:
No one is shitting on Beau for his service.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:25 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
No bud, there is no use for me to argue with you. You constantly end up calling anyone who you don’t agree with or understand an idiot even though you argue topics which you don’t know what you’re talking about
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:26 pm to minister of truth
I know more about this topic than you ever will. Your half-assed argument about "presumption doesn't mean fact" demonstrated that.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:28 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
So enlighten me. How do you know more about this topic than I do?
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:29 pm to minister of truth
I see you’re new here.
Pro Tip: the gal you are speaking with is the board contrarian. She’s been doing this for years. Probably a sociopath and definitely a narcissist.
She is feeding off your energy because everyone, including her own mother and kids, hates her.
She’s been doing it for years. It’s a shtick. A game. An act. And she…
She’s insufferable.
Pro Tip: the gal you are speaking with is the board contrarian. She’s been doing this for years. Probably a sociopath and definitely a narcissist.
She is feeding off your energy because everyone, including her own mother and kids, hates her.
She’s been doing it for years. It’s a shtick. A game. An act. And she…
She’s insufferable.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:29 pm to minister of truth
No, that's not how this is going to go. I've demonstrated that I know what I'm talking about. You've demonstrated that you can frick up what you read on Google.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:30 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Errerrerrwere
frick off, stalker.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:30 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Damn you’re turning into a real Biden defender. Beau was never close to a burn pit
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News