- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Lee vs Jefferson debate could be Dangerous and a Disaster.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 12/18/08 at 6:08 pm
Ok Ive been on here for about 2 weeks now. And the two biggest issues Ive seen on here have been the obvious:
1. The QB debate
2. The defense, whether it be on the field play or the coaching staff.
However one thing has me worried like no other. We have enough talent coming back and in next year to compete legitimately for the SEC championship. My worst nightmare is that there is an INTERNAL debate within the locker room as to who the offensive leader of the team should be.
Ive been on here debating left and right about JJ vs JLee with posters like specs1. But the one thing about me vs specs1 is that our back and forth wont hurt team chemistry or cause a divided locker room. I think thats the absolute worst case scenario.
Im sure many of us remember the Randall vs Russell deal. Some of us are even old enough to remember the Davey vs Booty fiasco many years ago. We didnt play at our best or potential those years. Im scared to death this might happen next year within the locker room.
As much as I do not want to see Lee start, I would rather Miles made him the definite starter with no questions to lead a UNIFIED LSU team vs one where Jefferson or RS starts with a divided team.
Anyone else feel like this?
1. The QB debate
2. The defense, whether it be on the field play or the coaching staff.
However one thing has me worried like no other. We have enough talent coming back and in next year to compete legitimately for the SEC championship. My worst nightmare is that there is an INTERNAL debate within the locker room as to who the offensive leader of the team should be.
Ive been on here debating left and right about JJ vs JLee with posters like specs1. But the one thing about me vs specs1 is that our back and forth wont hurt team chemistry or cause a divided locker room. I think thats the absolute worst case scenario.
Im sure many of us remember the Randall vs Russell deal. Some of us are even old enough to remember the Davey vs Booty fiasco many years ago. We didnt play at our best or potential those years. Im scared to death this might happen next year within the locker room.
As much as I do not want to see Lee start, I would rather Miles made him the definite starter with no questions to lead a UNIFIED LSU team vs one where Jefferson or RS starts with a divided team.
Anyone else feel like this?
Posted on 12/18/08 at 6:10 pm to amarti9
it won't be a problem. Don't forget about Sheppard.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 6:13 pm to amarti9
quote:
Anyone else feel like this?
i dont
Posted on 12/18/08 at 6:17 pm to learnthehardway
I dont see how you guys dont see this as a potential problem.
I think a lot of this depends HEAVILY on Miles and Crowton. Hopefully they have the vision to see this possible runaway train coming down the track. Im just nervous that the team may get divided over this. I dont want to see another T.O. vs Philly or T.O. vs Romo/Witten type deal where you have the team picking sides instead of rallying together.
If Miles is indecisive then this could be a problem.
I think a lot of this depends HEAVILY on Miles and Crowton. Hopefully they have the vision to see this possible runaway train coming down the track. Im just nervous that the team may get divided over this. I dont want to see another T.O. vs Philly or T.O. vs Romo/Witten type deal where you have the team picking sides instead of rallying together.
If Miles is indecisive then this could be a problem.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 6:20 pm to amarti9
dude , this is russell shepards team. the others are simply placeholders.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 9:30 pm to learnthehardway
I don't think "Rantards" bickering will have much of an effect on the team.... 
Posted on 12/18/08 at 9:35 pm to amarti9
quote:
Im sure many of us remember the Randall vs Russell deal
And Russell (the younger QB who most argued should start) turned out to be much better
quote:
Some of us are even old enough to remember the Davey vs Booty fiasco many years ago
And Davey (the QB who most argued should start) turned out to be much better
By the way..."many" years ago? What, like 9-10? That's not many my friend. It's still fresh in many minds. Trust me.
Booty =
Davey =
Posted on 12/18/08 at 9:40 pm to learnthehardway
It could be a big problem, but I favor there being a few capable guys than none. Really it's too early to tell. The bowl game COULD tell us a lot, or could tell us nothing. One thing for sure, spring game will be interesting with JJ, JL, and RS.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 9:41 pm to amarti9
quote:
Some of us are even old enough to remember the Davey vs Booty fiasco many years ago
us geezers even remember Dinardo and gasp... Curley
Back to top
4







