- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Employees at Starbucks on S. Sherwood have Unionized
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:43 pm to BigBinBR
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:43 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
For a single location it’s not hard for Starbucks. Don’t agree to their demands, let them strike, close the store because there is no business.
Risky. The current NLRB is very pro-union and would likely take the position that the closure of the single location was due to its unionization. A permanent closure due to a strike likely won't pass muster.
They can shut all of their stores down, which of course they won't. Companies have the absolute right to shut down everything, even if they admit they are doing it because they don't want to deal with a union.
Posted on 1/11/24 at 8:11 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
Risky. The current NLRB is very pro-union and would likely take the position that the closure of the single location was due to its unionization.
Yeah, but there is nothing that says that they have to give in to union demands. Especially when their demands are: asking for better wages, racial and gender equity, and fairer scheduling.
They are already paid better than the BR average for unskilled labor, “racial and gender equity” is nonsense(look at the photo of the employees), and “fairer scheduling” is totally subjective.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News